Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes in Science through the Implementation of Problem-Based Instruction

Majenun Majenun(1*),

(1) Science Teacher, SMP Negeri 27 Rarowatu Utara, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Learning outcomes in science subjects are strongly influenced by the learning strategies implemented in the classroom. However, many students still experience difficulties in understanding scientific concepts due to passive learning environments and limited student engagement. This study aims to improve students’ learning outcomes in science through the implementation of the Problem-Based Instruction (PBI) model. This research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted in two cycles, each consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The participants were students of Grade VII at SMP Negeri 27 Rarowatu Utara during the academic year 2024/2025. Data were collected through observation, learning achievement tests, and documentation. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative techniques. The results indicated a significant improvement in students’ learning outcomes after the implementation of the Problem-Based Instruction model. In Cycle I, students’ learning achievement showed moderate improvement, while in Cycle II, students demonstrated higher mastery of the learning material and increased active participation during the learning process. These findings indicate that Problem-Based Instruction effectively enhances students’ understanding, engagement, and critical thinking skills in science learning. Therefore, it can be concluded that the implementation of Problem-Based Instruction contributes positively to improving students’ learning outcomes and creating a more meaningful and student-centered learning environment.

Keywords


Problem-Based Instruction, learning outcomes, science learning, classroom action research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill

Education.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian

Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54.

https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia 2018: Akses makin meluas, saatnya

tingkatkan kualitas

Lie, A. (2008). Cooperative learning: Mempraktikkan cooperative learning di ruangruang kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Murti, W., & Anas, M. (2019). Penerapan pola pemberdayaan berpikir melalui pertanyaan

dalam model pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray untuk meningkatkan aktivitas

dan hasil belajar pada mata kuliah mikrobiologi terapan. Biology Teaching and

Learning Journal, 2(2), 101–113.

Oktaviana, W., & Jasri, I. (2020). Perbandingan hasil belajar model Two Stay Two Stray

dengan Think Pair Share. Jurnal Vokasional Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika,

(4), 140–148.

Ratnawulan, N., & Kania, N. (2020). Penggunaan model cooperative learning tipe

Numbered Head Together (NHT) untuk meningkatkan keaktifan belajar. Jurnal

THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 4(2), 161–168.

Yusri, M., Mantasiah, R., & Jufri. (2018). The use of Two Stay Two Stray model in

English teaching to increase students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Advanced

English Studies, 1(1), 39–43.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jte.v4i2.2678

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 70 times
PDF - 27 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Teaching and Education

Journal of Teaching and Education under ISSN 2963-5667, Jl. Pemuda, No. 339 Kolaka, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, USN Scientific Journal Publisher (Hardcopy Provider) Jl. Pemuda, No. 339 Kolaka, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia - 93517 E-mail: info@usnsj.com

Creative Commons LicenseJournal of Teaching and Education licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Â