ANALYZING STUDENTS' ABILITIES AS PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS IN CONSTRUCTING PROOFS: A STUDY OF GEOMETRY AND ALGEBRA
(1) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, Fall, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.02.001
Bosque, B., Segovia, I., & Lupiáñez, J. L. (2017). The role of aesthetics in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pna, 12(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1
Brown, J. R. (1991). Thought Experiments: A Platonic Account. In Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy (pp. 119–128). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3190/1/7_brown.pdf
Capraro, R. M. (2001). Exploring the Influence of Geometric Spatial Visualization, Gender and Ethnicity on the Acquisition of Geometry Content Knowledge. Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, 1, 1–9.
Dabbour, L. M. (2012). Geometric proportions: The underlying structure of design process for Islamic geometric patterns. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.08.005
Feriyanto. (2018). The Ability of Students’ Mathematical Proof in Determining the Validity of Argument Reviewed from Gender Differences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012042
Fried, M. N. (2006). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Zdm, 38(2), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655890
Grandgirard, J., Poinsot, D., Krespi, L., Nénon, J. P., & Cortesero, A. M. (2002). Costs of secondary parasitism in the facultative hyperparasitoid Pachycrepoideus dubius: Does host size matter? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 103(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
Harel, G. (2011). The framework presented here is part of the DNR Project, supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation (REC 0310128). Opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Foundation. 1. Rec 0310128, 265–290.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (2016). Sex Differences in Aggression : A Rejoinder and Reprise Author ( s ): Eleanor E . Maccoby and Carol Nagy Jacklin Published by : Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/1129535 REFERENCES Li. 51(4), 964–980.
Messick, S. (1994). The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002013
Oxburgh, L. (2021). Making the connection. In Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (Vol. 32, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2021101354
Raman, M. (2003). Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024360204239
Stewart Shapiro-Thinking about Mathematics_ The Philosophy of Mathematics-Oxford University Press, USA (2000).pdf. (n.d.).
Usiskin, Z. (2021). What Should Not Be in The Algebra and Geometry Curricula of Average College-Bound Students? The Mathematics Teacher, 73(6), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.73.6.0413
Weber, K. (2004). a Framework for Describing the Processes That. Psychology, 4, 425–432.
Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2–3), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040410.57253.a1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v8i2.1952
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 179 timesPDF - 58 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Soffil Widadah, Dwi Juniati