Mathematical Representations Based on Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles
(1) Universitas Islam Malang
(2) Universitas Islam Malang
(3) Universitas Islam Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Bakar, Z., & Ali, R. (2018). Interchangeable Concept of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles: a Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i2.6573
Arnidha, Y., Khairunnisa, M., Widada, W., & Nugroho, K. U. Z. (2018). Pattern of mathematic representation ability in magnetic electricity problem Pattern of mathematic representation ability in magnetic electricity problem. ICMSE2017. https://doi.org/doi :10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012015 1234567890
Bassey, S. W., Umoren, G., & Udida, L. A. (2009). Cognitive Styles , Secondary School Students ’ Attitude and Academic Performance in Chemistry in Akwa Ibom State – Nigeria . Episteme Conferences, 1–8. www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-2/e-proceedings/bassey
Bintoro, H. S., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Mulyono, M., & Walid, W. (2022). The spatial thinking process of the field-dependent students in reconstructing the geometrical concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 1116–1124. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22399
Bossé, M. J., Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Cheetham, M. R. (2011). Assessing the difficulty of mathematical translations: Synthesizing the literature and novel findings. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/264
Buchbinder, O., & Kuntze, S. (2018). Representations of Practice in Teacher Education and Research—Spotlights on Different Approaches. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70594-1_1
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research, planning, conduting, and evaluating, qualitative dan quantitative approaches. Sage Publictions.
Friedlander, A., & Tabach, M. (2001). Promoting multiple representations in algebra. The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics, January 2001, 173–185.
Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572–577.
Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive Style and its Relevance for Management Practice. British Journal of Management, 5(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00068.x
Himmah, M., & Rahaju, E. B. (2021). Analysis of Student’S Mathematics Representation in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Spatial Cognitive Style. MATHEdunesa, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n2.ppdf_189-199
Jitendra, A. K., Nelson, G., Pulles, S. M., Kiss, A. J., & Houseworth, J. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
Khairunnisa, M., & Masrukan. (2020). Mathematical Representation Ability Viewed from the students’ cognitive style in Two Stay Two Stray with Product Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v9i2.32224
Montague, M. (2007). Self-Regulation and Mathematics Instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00232.x
Mukhtar, N. M., Mulbar, U., & Upu, H. (2021). Mathematics Representation Ability Based on Self- Efficacy and Non-Cognitive Variables. 611(ICoESM), 271–277.
Nasrun, Prahmana, R. C. I., & Akib, I. (2023). The Students ’ Representative Processes in Solving Mathematical Word Problems. Knowledge, 70–79.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.
Noto, M. S., Hartono, W., & Sundawan, D. (2016). Analysis of Students Mathematical Representation and Connection on Analytical Geometry Subject. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.216
Nurrahmawati, Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, & Muksar, M. (2021). Assessing students’ errors in mathematical translation: From symbolic to verbal and graphic representations. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20819
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
Prihandhika, A., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). The Investigation of Concept Image towards Derivative Representation: A Case Study of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 14(4), 148–164.
Ratuanik, M. (2018). Cognitive Process Of Students In Solving Mathematical Problem Judging From Cognitive Style Of Field independent And Field dependent In Junior High School. The International Conference on Mathematical Analysis, Its Applications and Learning, 69–80.
Rofiq, E. A., Rochmad, R., & Cahyono, E. (2021). Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability in Word Problems with Learning Cycle 7E Based on Cognitive Style. Ujmer, 10(2), 163–170.
Sari, L. M., & Sutirna, S. (2022). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik Smp Pada Materi Himpunan. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 7(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v7i2.7220
Sellah, M. L., Jacinta, D. K., & Helen, P. M. (2017). Analysis of Student-Teacher Cognitive Styles Interaction: An Approach to Understanding Learner Performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 10–20.
Septian, A., Darhim, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Mathematical representation ability through geogebra-assisted project-based learning models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012019
Setiawan, Y. E. (2022). Prospective Teachers Representations in Problem Solving of Special Angle Trigonometry Functions Based on the Level of Ability. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p55-76
Setiawan, Y. E., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Sisworo. (2020). Generalization strategy of linear patterns from field-dependent cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9134.77-94
Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students’ mathematical problem-solving ability based on teaching models intervention and cognitive style. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222
Spector, M. J. (2012). Foundations of Educational Technology: Integrative Approaches and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How To Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. United States.
Utami, C. T. P., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). Profile of students ’ mathematical representation ability in solving geometry problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science PAPER. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012123
Widakdo, W. A. (2017). Mathematical Representation Ability by Using Project Based Learning on the Topic of Statistics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012055
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v8i2.1981
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 135 timesPDF - 58 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Juliyat Hadi Sobirin, Yayan Eryk Setiawan, Surya Sari Faradiba